Gender Differences among Nurses in Managing Arterial Puncture-Related Pain: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study.
Julio Alberto Mateos-ArroyoIgnacio Zaragoza-GarcíaRubén Sanchez-GomezPaloma Posada-MorenoSara García-AlmazánIsmael Ortuño-SorianoPublished in: Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) (2024)
There is evidence that healthcare can be executed differentially depending on the gender of patients, researchers, and clinicians. The aim was to analyze the possible existence of nursing gender differences in pain management produced by arterial puncture for blood gas analysis. A cross-sectional, multicenter study designed was conducted in Castilla-la Mancha (Spain). Variables of interest were collected from nurses in the public health system of a European region through a questionnaire. Data were collected for four months; the primary outcome was the use of any intervention to reduce pain and the explanatory variable was the nurse's gender. Bivariate analysis was carried out to assess associations between gender and pain-reducing interventions and a multivariate model was created with those factors that were relevant using logistic regression. A significantly higher proportion of men reported using some form of intervention (45% vs. 30%) and had more specific training (45.9% vs. 32.4%). The adjusted probability of using pain-reducing interventions by men was 71% higher than women. Thus, we found gender differences in the management of pain caused by arterial punctures performed by nurses as the main healthcare providers.
Keyphrases
- pain management
- healthcare
- chronic pain
- mental health
- neuropathic pain
- randomized controlled trial
- end stage renal disease
- ejection fraction
- newly diagnosed
- chronic kidney disease
- cross sectional
- emergency department
- spinal cord injury
- palliative care
- ultrasound guided
- metabolic syndrome
- type diabetes
- spinal cord
- patient reported outcomes
- room temperature
- pregnancy outcomes
- social media