Efficacy and Tolerability of Perampanel in Brain Tumor-Related Epilepsy: A Systematic Review.
Jessica RossiFrancesco CavallieriMaria Chiara BassiGiuseppe BiaginiRomana RizziMarco RussoMassimo BondavalliCorrado IaccarinoGiacomo PavesiSalvatore CozziLucia GiaccheriniMasoumeh NajafiAnna PisanelloFranco ValzaniaPublished in: Biomedicines (2023)
(1) Background: Epilepsy is a frequent comorbidity in patients with brain tumors, in whom seizures are often drug-resistant. Current evidence suggests that excess of glutamatergic activity in the tumor microenvironment may favor epileptogenesis, but also tumor growth and invasiveness. The selective non-competitive α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) receptor antagonist perampanel (PER) was demonstrated to be efficacious and well-tolerated in patients with focal seizures. Moreover, preclinical in vitro studies suggested a potential anti-tumor activity of this drug. In this systematic review, the clinical evidence on the efficacy and tolerability of PER in brain tumor-related epilepsy (BTRE) is summarized. (2) Methods: Five databases and two clinical trial registries were searched from inception to December 2022. (3) Results: Seven studies and six clinical trials were included. Sample size ranged from 8 to 36 patients, who received add-on PER (mean dosage from 4 to 7 mg/day) for BTRE. After a 6-12 month follow-up, the responder rate (% of patients achieving seizure freedom or reduction ≥ 50% of seizure frequency) ranged from 75% to 95%, with a seizure freedom rate of up to 94%. Regarding tolerability, 11-52% of patients experienced non-severe adverse effects (most frequent: dizziness, vertigo, anxiety, irritability). The retention rate ranged from 56% to 83%. However, only up to 12.5% of patients discontinued the drug because of the adverse events. (4) Conclusions: PER seems to be efficacious, safe, and well-tolerated in patients with BTRE. Further randomized studies should be conducted in more homogeneous and larger populations, also evaluating the effect of PER on tumor progression, overall survival, and progression-free survival.
Keyphrases
- clinical trial
- end stage renal disease
- systematic review
- drug resistant
- open label
- newly diagnosed
- ejection fraction
- prognostic factors
- peritoneal dialysis
- phase ii
- randomized controlled trial
- free survival
- multidrug resistant
- emergency department
- physical activity
- early onset
- machine learning
- pseudomonas aeruginosa
- risk assessment
- adverse drug
- temporal lobe epilepsy
- poor prognosis
- long non coding rna
- big data
- meta analyses