Login / Signup

Radical Hysterectomy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer.

Giorgio BoganiViolante Di DonatoGiovanni ScambiaFrancesco RaspagliesiVito ChianteraGiulio SozziTullio Golia D'AugèLudovico MuziiPierluigi Benedetti PaniciOttavia D'OriaEnrico VizzaAndrea Giannininull On Behalf Of The Investigators Of The Italian Gynecological Cancer Study Group
Published in: International journal of environmental research and public health (2022)
Radical hysterectomy and plus pelvic node dissection are the primary methods of treatment for patients with early stage cervical cancer. During the last decade, growing evidence has supported the adoption of a minimally invasive approach. Retrospective data suggested that minimally invasive surgery improves perioperative outcomes, without neglecting long-term oncologic outcomes. In 2018, the guidelines from the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology stated that a "minimally invasive approach is favored" in comparison with open surgery. However, the phase III, randomized Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer (LACC) trial questioned the safety of the minimally invasive approach. The LACC trial highlighted that the execution of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy correlates with an increased risk of recurrence and death. After its publication, other retrospective studies investigated this issue, with differing results. Recent evidence suggested that robotic-assisted surgery is not associated with an increased risk of worse oncologic outcomes. The phase III randomized Robotic-assisted Approach to Cervical Cancer (RACC) and the Robotic Versus Open Hysterectomy Surgery in Cervix Cancer (ROCC) trials will clarify the pros and cons of performing a robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy (with tumor containment before colpotomy) in early stage cervical cancer.
Keyphrases