Effectiveness of Telemedicine Compared with Standard Care for Patients with Rheumatic Diseases: A Systematic Review.
Andres Hormaza-JaramilloAna ArredondoElias ForeroSebastian HerreraCarlos OchoaÁlvaro Arbeláez-CortésAndres Ricardo Fernandez AldanaAndrea RodriguezLuisa AmadorNatalia CastañoJuan Manuel Reyes-SanchezPublished in: Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association (2022)
Objective: The aim of this study was to systematically review the evidence on the effectiveness of telemedicine compared to standard care for patients with rheumatic diseases. Methods: A search was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews; for the gray literature, GREYNET databases and a snowball search were used. MeSH or Emtree terms. Three authors independently selected systematic reviews, randomized controlled trail (RCTs), or non-RCTs with patients with autoimmune or inflammatory rheumatic diseases, where telemedicine was compared with standard care. Effectiveness was measured in terms of disease activity, quality of life, and functional activity. The patients' satisfaction was also measured. The risk of bias was assessed by the Cochrane collaboration tool for RCTs and AMSTAR II for systematic reviews. Results: Four RCTs, one cross-out study, and five systematic reviews were included. The studies were conducted with rheumatoid arthritis patients, and one study involved patients with systematic lupus erythematosus. The interventions mainly involved teleconsultation and telemonitoring, with patient-reported outcomes (PROs) being compared with standard care. Four studies measured the effectiveness of telemedicine using PROs, in which three of the RCTs did not find differences in the clinical outcomes, and one found that telemedicine improved the remission of diseases, functional impairment, and radiographic joint damage progression. Two studies measured patient satisfaction with telemedicine and standard care without a significant difference between the groups. Conclusions: Despite heterogeneity between studies, the findings were remarkably consistent in demonstrating that there was no significant difference between the telemedicine group and the control group in terms of PROs and patient satisfaction. Patients should be offered the option of telemedicine to manage their diseases as part of health-care support. Further research is needed on the effectiveness of telemedicine in the long term for patients with rheumatic diseases.
Keyphrases
- systematic review
- disease activity
- healthcare
- rheumatoid arthritis patients
- patient reported outcomes
- patient satisfaction
- randomized controlled trial
- end stage renal disease
- palliative care
- systemic lupus erythematosus
- rheumatoid arthritis
- quality improvement
- ejection fraction
- newly diagnosed
- affordable care act
- chronic kidney disease
- ankylosing spondylitis
- peritoneal dialysis
- oxidative stress
- pain management
- prognostic factors
- physical activity
- meta analyses
- case control
- clinical trial
- single cell
- machine learning
- social media