Login / Signup

Histological and immunohistochemical soft-tissue response to cylindrical and concave abutments: Multicenter randomized clinical trial.

Fabio Camacho AlonsoJuan Carlos Bernabeu-MiraJoaquín SánchezAntonio Julián BuendíaAna María Mercado-DíazMario Pérez-SayánsAlba Pérez-JardónJosé Manuel Somoza MartínJavier MonteroCristina Gomez-PoloNorberto Quispe-LópezDavid Peñarrocha-Oltra
Published in: Journal of periodontology (2024)
This study looked at how 2 different shapes of dental implant abutments (the parts that connect the implant to the crown), specifically concave and cylindrical, affect the soft tissue around the implants. We wanted to see how these shapes influenced the tissue's size, structure, and health. We conducted a clinical trial with 37 patients, comparing the 2 types of abutments in the same mouth over 12 weeks. Our findings showed that the concave abutments led to a taller and more extensive layer of protective tissue around the implant compared to the cylindrical ones. This protective tissue had more favorable collagen fiber orientation, which is important for the strength and health of the tissue. Additionally, the concave abutments resulted in less inflammation and better tissue integration. In conclusion, concave abutments may provide better support and health for the soft tissue around dental implants, reducing the risk of chronic inflammation and potentially leading to better long-term outcomes for patients with dental implants.
Keyphrases