Comparisons of Quality, Correctness, and Similarity Between ChatGPT-Generated and Human-Written Abstracts for Basic Research: Cross-Sectional Study.

Shu-Li Cheng Shih-Jen Tsai Ya-Mei Bai Chih Hung Ko Chih-Wei Hsu Fu-Chi Yang Chia-Kuang Tsai Chin-Ling Chen Szu-Nian Yang Ping-Tao Tseng Tien-Wei Hsu Chih-Sung Liang Wen-Pang Su

Published in: Journal of medical Internet research (2023)

Using ChatGPT to generate a scientific abstract may not lead to issues of similarity when using real full texts written by humans. However, the quality of the ChatGPT-generated abstracts was suboptimal, and their accuracy was not 100%.

Keyphrases

cross sectional
endothelial cells
quality improvement
induced pluripotent stem cells
pluripotent stem cells