Phenotypic discordance between primary and metastatic breast cancer in the large-scale real-life multicenter French ESME cohort.
Thomas GrindaNatacha JoyonAmélie LusqueSarah LefèvreLaurent ArnouldFrédérique Penault-LlorcaGaëtan MacgroganIsabelle TreilleuxAnne-Vincent SalomonJuliette HaudebourgAurélie Maran-GonzalezEmmanuelle Charafe-JauffretCoralie CourtinardCamille FranchetVéronique VerrieleEtienne G C BrainPatrick TasCécile Blanc-FournierAgnès LerouxDelphine LoussouarnAnca BerghianEva BrabencovaJean Pierre GhnassiaJean-Yves ScoazecSuzette DelalogeThomas FilleronMagali Lacroix-TrikiPublished in: NPJ breast cancer (2021)
Expression of hormone receptor (HR) for estrogens (ER) and progesterone (PR) and HER2 remains the cornerstone to define the therapeutic strategy for breast cancer patients. We aimed to compare phenotypic profiles between matched primary and metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in the ESME database, a National real-life multicenter cohort of MBC patients. Patients with results available on both primary tumour and metastatic disease within 6 months of MBC diagnosis and before any tumour progression were eligible for the main analysis. Among the 16,703 patients included in the database, 1677 (10.0%) had available biopsy results at MBC diagnosis and on matched primary tumour. The change rate of either HR or HER2 was 27.0%. Global HR status changed (from positive = either ER or PR positive, to negative = both negative; and reverse) in 14.2% of the cases (expression loss in 72.5% and gain in 27.5%). HER2 status changed in 7.8% (amplification loss in 45.2%). The discordance rate appeared similar across different biopsy sites. Metastasis to bone, HER2+ and RH+/HER2- subtypes and previous adjuvant endocrine therapy, but not relapse interval were associated with an HR discordance in multivariable analysis. Loss of HR status was significantly associated with a risk of death (HR adjusted = 1.51, p = 0.002) while gain of HR and HER2 discordance was not. In conclusion, discordance of HR and HER2 expression between primary and metastatic breast cancer cannot be neglected. In addition, HR loss is associated with worse survival. Sampling metastatic sites is essential for treatment adjustment.
Keyphrases
- metastatic breast cancer
- end stage renal disease
- poor prognosis
- ejection fraction
- chronic kidney disease
- newly diagnosed
- small cell lung cancer
- prognostic factors
- peritoneal dialysis
- clinical trial
- emergency department
- stem cells
- patient reported outcomes
- early stage
- cross sectional
- adverse drug
- endoplasmic reticulum
- free survival
- electronic health record
- quality improvement
- cell therapy
- postmenopausal women
- data analysis
- nucleic acid