Login / Signup

Validation testing to determine the sensitivity of lateral flow testing for asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 detection in low prevalence settings: Testing frequency and public health messaging is key.

Jack FergusonSteven J DunnAngus BestJeremy MirzaBenita PercivalMegan MayhewOliver MegramFiona AshfordThomas WhiteEmma Moles-GarciaLiam CrawfordTim PlantAndrew BosworthMichael KiddAlex RichterJonathan DeeksAlan McNally
Published in: PLoS biology (2021)
Lateral flow devices (LFDs) are quickly being implemented for use in large-scale population surveillance programs for SARS-CoV-2 infection in the United Kingdom. These programs have been piloted in city-wide screening in the city of Liverpool and are now being rolled out to support care home visits and the return home of University students for the Christmas break. Here, we present data on the performance of LFDs to test almost 8,000 students at the University of Birmingham between December 2 and December 9, 2020. The performance is validated against almost 800 samples using PCR performed in the University Pillar 2 testing lab and theoretically validated on thousands of Pillar 2 PCR testing results performed on low-prevalence care home testing samples. Our data show that LFDs do not detect infections presenting with PCR Ct values over 29 to 30 as determined using the Thermo Fisher TaqPath asssay. This may be of particular importance in detecting individuals that are either at the early, or late stages of infection, and reinforces the need for frequent, recurrent testing.
Keyphrases
  • public health
  • healthcare
  • sars cov
  • palliative care
  • computed tomography
  • risk factors
  • electronic health record
  • quality improvement
  • cross sectional
  • magnetic resonance
  • case report
  • coronavirus disease
  • image quality