Health system structure and its influence on outcomes: The Canadian experience.
Braden R MannsStephanie HastingsGreg MarchildonTom NoseworthyPublished in: Healthcare management forum (2024)
Healthcare delivery systems in Canada are structured using three models: individual institutions, health regions, and single provincial systems, usually with smaller geographic zones. The comparative ability of these models to improve care, outcomes, and the Quadruple Aim is largely unstudied. We reviewed Canadian studies examining outcomes of provincial healthcare delivery system restructuring. Across models, results were inconsistent, and quality of evidence was low. For all provinces, primary care sits outside healthcare delivery systems, with limited governance and integration. The single provincial model can reduce costs of non-clinical support functions like finance, human resources, and analytics. This model may also be best at reducing variations in care, improving electronic information integration that enables clinical decision support and reporting, and supporting the provincial spread and scale of innovations, but further refinements are required and existing studies have major limitations, limiting definitive conclusions.
Keyphrases
- healthcare
- primary care
- clinical decision support
- health information
- quality improvement
- palliative care
- endothelial cells
- helicobacter pylori
- type diabetes
- electronic health record
- risk assessment
- mental health
- radiation therapy
- pain management
- metabolic syndrome
- squamous cell carcinoma
- helicobacter pylori infection
- pluripotent stem cells
- social media
- adverse drug
- human health
- global health