The effect of real word stimuli versus non-word stimuli on oral diadochokinetic rates across the life span: An item discrimination analysis.

What is already known on this subject Age, type of stimuli (real words versus non-words) and language significantly affect DDK rates performance. Current research strongly suggests the administration of language-specific norms since language-dependent features seem to have a noteworthy effect on the DDK rates, but scarce evidence exists about the discriminatory ability of the DDK speech stimuli commonly administered. What this study adds to the existing knowledge Conflicting findings have been reported about the effect of different types of DDK speech stimuli (real words and non-words) but no study to date has evaluated their discriminatory abilities. The current study is the first to implement a polytomous IRT model to examine this issue. This is also the first study to attempt an investigation of the effect of types of stimuli (real words versus non-words) on a large representative sample across the lifespan (4-90+ years) and to provide normative data for Greek. What are the practical and clinical implications of this work? The present study offers concrete evidence about the advantage of real-word stimuli over non-word stimuli in Greek, as well as normative data for the Greek-speaking populations. Moreover, the IRT analysis testifies to the discriminatory ability of real-word and non-word stimuli affirming the reliability of the present dual DDK assessment protocol as a psychometrically sound measure of DDK ability. The above has significant value for clinicians who work with individuals with motor speech disorders as the protocol can help them with the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of motor speech disorders.