Artificial intelligence and radiomics: fundamentals, applications, and challenges in immunotherapy.
Laurent DercleJeremy McGaleShawn SunAurélien MarabelleRandy YehEric DeutschFatima-Zohra MokraneMichael FarwellSamy AmmariHeiko SchoderBinsheng ZhaoLawrence H SchwartzPublished in: Journal for immunotherapy of cancer (2022)
Immunotherapy offers the potential for durable clinical benefit but calls into question the association between tumor size and outcome that currently forms the basis for imaging-guided treatment. Artificial intelligence (AI) and radiomics allow for discovery of novel patterns in medical images that can increase radiology's role in management of patients with cancer, although methodological issues in the literature limit its clinical application. Using keywords related to immunotherapy and radiomics, we performed a literature review of MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and Embase from database inception through February 2022. We removed all duplicates, non-English language reports, abstracts, reviews, editorials, perspectives, case reports, book chapters, and non-relevant studies. From the remaining articles, the following information was extracted: publication information, sample size, primary tumor site, imaging modality, primary and secondary study objectives, data collection strategy (retrospective vs prospective, single center vs multicenter), radiomic signature validation strategy, signature performance, and metrics for calculation of a Radiomics Quality Score (RQS). We identified 351 studies, of which 87 were unique reports relevant to our research question. The median (IQR) of cohort sizes was 101 (57-180). Primary stated goals for radiomics model development were prognostication (n=29, 33.3%), treatment response prediction (n=24, 27.6%), and characterization of tumor phenotype (n=14, 16.1%) or immune environment (n=13, 14.9%). Most studies were retrospective (n=75, 86.2%) and recruited patients from a single center (n=57, 65.5%). For studies with available information on model testing, most (n=54, 65.9%) used a validation set or better. Performance metrics were generally highest for radiomics signatures predicting treatment response or tumor phenotype, as opposed to immune environment and overall prognosis. Out of a possible maximum of 36 points, the median (IQR) of RQS was 12 (10-16). While a rapidly increasing number of promising results offer proof of concept that AI and radiomics could drive precision medicine approaches for a wide range of indications, standardizing the data collection as well as optimizing the methodological quality and rigor are necessary before these results can be translated into clinical practice.
Keyphrases
- artificial intelligence
- big data
- lymph node metastasis
- deep learning
- machine learning
- contrast enhanced
- clinical practice
- case control
- high resolution
- cross sectional
- systematic review
- end stage renal disease
- case report
- electronic health record
- clinical trial
- ejection fraction
- healthcare
- magnetic resonance
- squamous cell carcinoma
- health information
- gene expression
- emergency department
- adverse drug
- quality improvement
- chronic kidney disease
- high throughput
- risk assessment
- double blind
- genome wide
- human health
- global health