Login / Signup

Critical Assessment of Metagenome Interpretation: the second round of challenges.

Fernando MeyerAdrian FritzZhi-Luo DengDavid KoslickiTill Robin LeskerAlexey GurevichGary RobertsonMohammed AlserDmitry AntipovFrancesco BeghiniDenis BertrandJaqueline J BritoC Titus BrownJan P BuchmannAydin BuluçBo ChenRayan ChikhiPhilip T L C ClausenAlexandru CristianPiotr Wojciech DabrowskiAaron E DarlingRob EganEleazar EskinEvangelos GeorganasEugene GoltsmanMelissa A GrayLars Hestbjerg HansenSteven HofmeyrPingqin HuangLuiz IrberHuijue JiaTue Sparholt JørgensenSilas D KieserTerje KlemetsenAxel KolaMikhail KolmogorovAnton KorobeynikovJason KwanNathan LaPierreClaire LemaitreChenhao LiAntoine LimassetFábio Malcher MirandaSerghei MangulVanessa R MarcelinoCamille MarchetPierre MarijonDmitry MeleshkoDaniel R MendeAlessio MilaneseNiranjan NagarajanJakob NissenSergey NurkLeonid OlikerLucas PaoliPierre PeterlongoVitor C PiroJacob S PorterSimon RasmussenEvan R ReesKnut ReinertBernhard Y RenardEspen Mikal RobertsenGail L RosenHans-Joachim RuscheweyhVaruni SarwalNicola SegataEnrico SeilerLizhen ShiFengzhu SunShinichi SunagawaSøren Johannes SørensenAshleigh ThomasChengxuan TongMirko TrajkovskiJulien TremblayGherman UritskiyRiccardo VicedominiZhengyang WangZiye WangZhong WangAndrew WarrenNils Peder WillassenKatherine YelickRonghui YouGeorg ZellerZhengqiao ZhaoShanfeng ZhuJie ZhuRuben Garrido-OterPetra GastmeierStéphane HacquardSusanne HäußlerAriane KhalediFriederike MaechlerFantin MesnySimona RadutoiuPaul Schulze-LefertNathiana SmitTill StrowigAndreas BremgesAlexander SczyrbaAlice Carolyn McHardy
Published in: Nature methods (2022)
Evaluating metagenomic software is key for optimizing metagenome interpretation and focus of the Initiative for the Critical Assessment of Metagenome Interpretation (CAMI). The CAMI II challenge engaged the community to assess methods on realistic and complex datasets with long- and short-read sequences, created computationally from around 1,700 new and known genomes, as well as 600 new plasmids and viruses. Here we analyze 5,002 results by 76 program versions. Substantial improvements were seen in assembly, some due to long-read data. Related strains still were challenging for assembly and genome recovery through binning, as was assembly quality for the latter. Profilers markedly matured, with taxon profilers and binners excelling at higher bacterial ranks, but underperforming for viruses and Archaea. Clinical pathogen detection results revealed a need to improve reproducibility. Runtime and memory usage analyses identified efficient programs, including top performers with other metrics. The results identify challenges and guide researchers in selecting methods for analyses.
Keyphrases