Login / Signup

Journal recommended guidelines for systematic review and meta-analyses.

Adam B WilsonBoon Huat BayJessica N ByramMelissa A CarrollGabrielle Maria FinnHammer NielsSabine HildebrandtClaudia KrebsJonathan J WiscoJason M Organ
Published in: Anatomical sciences education (2024)
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses aggregate research findings across studies and populations, making them a valuable form of research evidence. Over the past decade, studies in medical education using these methods have increased by 630%. However, many manuscripts are not publication-ready due to inadequate planning and insufficient analyses. These guidelines aim to improve the clarity and comprehensiveness of reporting methodologies and outcomes, ensuring high quality and comparability. They align with existing standards like PRISMA, providing examples and best practices. Adhering to these guidelines is crucial for publication consideration in Anatomical Sciences Education.
Keyphrases
  • meta analyses
  • systematic review
  • medical education
  • randomized controlled trial
  • clinical practice
  • healthcare
  • case control
  • emergency department
  • skeletal muscle
  • adverse drug
  • glycemic control