Login / Signup

Immune selection determines tumor antigenicity and influences response to checkpoint inhibitors.

Luis ZapataGiulio CaravagnaMarc J WilliamsEszter LakatosKhalid AbdulJabbarBenjamin WernerDiego ChowellChela JamesLucie GourmetSalvatore MiliteAhmet AcarNadeem RiazTimothy A ChanTrevor A GrahamAndrea Sottoriva
Published in: Nature genetics (2023)
In cancer, evolutionary forces select for clones that evade the immune system. Here we analyzed >10,000 primary tumors and 356 immune-checkpoint-treated metastases using immune dN/dS, the ratio of nonsynonymous to synonymous mutations in the immunopeptidome, to measure immune selection in cohorts and individuals. We classified tumors as immune edited when antigenic mutations were removed by negative selection and immune escaped when antigenicity was covered up by aberrant immune modulation. Only in immune-edited tumors was immune predation linked to CD8 T cell infiltration. Immune-escaped metastases experienced the best response to immunotherapy, whereas immune-edited patients did not benefit, suggesting a preexisting resistance mechanism. Similarly, in a longitudinal cohort, nivolumab treatment removes neoantigens exclusively in the immunopeptidome of nonimmune-edited patients, the group with the best overall survival response. Our work uses dN/dS to differentiate between immune-edited and immune-escaped tumors, measuring potential antigenicity and ultimately helping predict response to treatment.
Keyphrases
  • crispr cas
  • end stage renal disease
  • chronic kidney disease
  • squamous cell carcinoma
  • dna damage
  • peritoneal dialysis
  • oxidative stress
  • genome wide
  • lymph node metastasis
  • combination therapy
  • patient reported