Who has a beef with reducing red and processed meat consumption? A media framing analysis.
Katherine E SievertMark Andrew LawrenceChristine ParkerCherie A RussellPhillip BakerPublished in: Public health nutrition (2021)
The polarisation of RPM reduction has led to a binary conflict between pro- and anti-meat reduction actors. This division may diminish the extent to which political leaders will prioritise this in policy agendas. Using nuanced and context-dependent messaging could ensure the narratives around meat are less conflicting and more effective in addressing health and environmental harms associated with RPM.