Characterization of Key Aroma Compounds in a Commercial Rum and an Australian Red Wine by Means of a New Sensomics-Based Expert System (SEBES)-An Approach To Use Artificial Intelligence in Determining Food Odor Codes.
Luca NicolottiVeronika MallPeter SchieberlePublished in: Journal of agricultural and food chemistry (2019)
Although to date more than 10 000 volatile compounds have been characterized in foods, a literature survey has previously shown that only 226 aroma compounds, assigned as key food odorants (KFOs), have been identified to actively contribute to the overall aromas of about 200 foods, such as beverages, meat products, cheeses, or baked goods. Currently, a multistep analytical procedure involving the human olfactory system, assigned as Sensomics, represents a reference approach to identify and quantitate key odorants, as well as to define their sensory impact in the overall food aroma profile by so-called aroma recombinates. Despite its proven effectiveness, the Sensomics approach is time-consuming because repeated sensory analyses, for example, by GC/olfactometry, are essential to assess the odor quality and potency of each single constituent in a given food distillate. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to develop a fast, but Sensomics-based expert system (SEBES) that is able to reliably predict the key aroma compounds of a given food in a limited number of runs without using the human olfactory system. First, a successful method for the quantitation of nearly 100 (out of the 226 known KFOs) components was developed in combination with a software allowing the direct use of the identification and quantitation data for the calculation of odor activity values (OAV; ratio of concentration to odor threshold). Using a rum and a wine as examples, the quantitative results obtained by the new SEBES method were compared to data obtained by applying an aroma extract dilution analysis and stable isotope dilution assays required in the classical Sensomics approach. A good agreement of the results was found with differences below 20% for most of the compounds considered. By implementing the GC × GC data analysis software with the in-house odor threshold database, odor activity values (ratio of concentration to odor threshold) were directly displayed in the software pane. The OAVs calculated by the software were in very good agreement with data manually calculated on the basis of the data obtained by SIDA. Thus, it was successfully shown that it is possible to characterize key food odorants with one single analytical platform and without using the human olfactory system, that is, by "artificial intelligence smelling".
Keyphrases
- data analysis
- artificial intelligence
- big data
- gas chromatography
- endothelial cells
- machine learning
- liquid chromatography
- human health
- electronic health record
- deep learning
- liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry
- systematic review
- induced pluripotent stem cells
- pluripotent stem cells
- tandem mass spectrometry
- ms ms
- randomized controlled trial
- high throughput
- high resolution
- risk assessment
- climate change
- cross sectional
- minimally invasive